Core i5-1035G7 vs Core i5-10200H

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-1035G7 vs Core i5-10200H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-1035G7 vs Core i5-10200H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-1035G7

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10200H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Core i5-10200H

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,997 vs 8,008).
❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-1035G7 better than Core i5-10200H?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-10200H is ahead with a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-1035G7 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-1035G7 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-1035G7 still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-1035G7 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10200H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-1035G7 vs Core i5-10200H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1035G7

The Core i5-1035G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1526. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,008 points. Launch price was $309.

Core i5-10200H

The Core i5-10200H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,997 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-1035G7 and Core i5-10200H share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-1035G7 versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-10200H — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-10200H (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-1035G7 uses the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-10200H uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1035G7 scores 8,008 against the Core i5-10200H's 7,997 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-1035G7. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,515 vs 1,300, a 15.3% lead for the Core i5-1035G7 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i5-1035G7	Core i5-10200H
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	4.1 GHz+11%
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	2.4 GHz+100%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake (Client) (2019)	Comet Lake-H (2020)
PassMark	8,008	7,997
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	5,372
Geekbench 6 Single	1,515+17%	1,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	4,392

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1035G7 uses the FCBGA1526 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-10200H uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR4-3733 on the Core i5-1035G7 versus DDR4-2933 on the Core i5-10200H — the Core i5-1035G7 supports 27.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10200H supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Core i5-1035G7	Core i5-10200H
Socket	FCBGA1526	BGA1440
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4-3733+27%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	128 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i5-1035G7 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-1035G7) vs Yes (Core i5-10200H). Both include integrated graphics — Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Core i5-1035G7) and Intel UHD Graphics (Core i5-10200H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1035G7 targets Premium Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-1035G7 rivals Ryzen 7 3700U.

Feature	Core i5-1035G7	Core i5-10200H
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Iris Plus Graphics G7	Intel UHD Graphics
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	Yes
Target Use	Premium Laptop	—