
Core i5-1038NG7

Xeon E5-4650
Core i5-1038NG7 vs Xeon E5-4650 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-1038NG7 vs Xeon E5-4650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-1038NG7 vs Xeon E5-4650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-1038NG7
2020Why buy it
- ✅+2.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 130W, a 102W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Plus Graphics G7, while Xeon E5-4650 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4650 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4650, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon E5-4650
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,599 vs 8,823).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $3,616 MSRP, while Core i5-1038NG7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌364.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 28W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1038NG7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-1038NG7 better than Xeon E5-4650?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-1038NG7 vs Xeon E5-4650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1038NG7
The Core i5-1038NG7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1344. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 8,823 points. Launch price was $320.

Xeon E5-4650
The Xeon E5-4650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,599 points. Launch price was $799.
Processing Power
The Core i5-1038NG7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4650 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-4650 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-1038NG7 versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4650 — a 14.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-1038NG7 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-1038NG7 uses the Ice Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-4650 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1038NG7 scores 8,823 against the Xeon E5-4650's 8,599 — a 2.6% lead for the Core i5-1038NG7. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-1038NG7 vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-4650.
| Feature | Core i5-1038NG7 | Xeon E5-4650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+15% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.7 GHz+35% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 20480 kB (total)+233% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-69% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-U (2019−2020) | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) |
| PassMark | 8,823+3% | 8,599 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,250 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1038NG7 uses the FCBGA1344 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4650 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-1038NG7 | Xeon E5-4650 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1344 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR4-3733 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-1038NG7) / not specified (Xeon E5-4650). The Core i5-1038NG7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus Graphics G7), while the Xeon E5-4650 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1038NG7 targets Premium Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-1038NG7 rivals Ryzen 7 4800U.
| Feature | Core i5-1038NG7 | Xeon E5-4650 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Plus Graphics G7 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Premium Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













