
Core i5-10500
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 4680U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10500
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 5 4680U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 4680U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Ryzen 5 4680U
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10500 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,959 vs 13,067).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-10500
2020Ryzen 5 4680U
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 5 4680U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 4680U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10500 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,959 vs 13,067).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10500 better than Ryzen 5 4680U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10500 | Ryzen 5 4680U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10500 | Ryzen 5 4680U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 327 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 327 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 281 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 327 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 325 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 327 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 251 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 63 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10500 | Ryzen 5 4680U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 327 FPS | 324 FPS |
| medium | 327 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 324 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 327 FPS | 324 FPS |
| medium | 327 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 324 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 327 FPS | 324 FPS |
| medium | 327 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 238 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10500 | Ryzen 5 4680U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 327 FPS | 324 FPS |
| medium | 327 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 324 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 327 FPS | 324 FPS |
| medium | 327 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 324 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 327 FPS | 324 FPS |
| medium | 327 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 282 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10500 and Ryzen 5 4680U

Core i5-10500
Core i5-10500
The Core i5-10500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 13,067 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 5 4680U
Ryzen 5 4680U
The Ryzen 5 4680U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 April 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,959 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-10500 and Ryzen 5 4680U share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-10500 versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 4680U — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-10500 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-10500 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 4680U uses Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10500 scores 13,067 against the Ryzen 5 4680U's 12,959 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-10500. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10500 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 4680U.
| Feature | Core i5-10500 | Ryzen 5 4680U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+13% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+41% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021) |
| PassMark | 13,067 | 12,959 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10500 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 4680U uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10500 | Ryzen 5 4680U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10500) / not specified (Ryzen 5 4680U). The Core i5-10500 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 5 4680U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10500 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-10500 | Ryzen 5 4680U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











