
Core i5-10500T

Xeon E5-2687W
Core i5-10500T vs Xeon E5-2687W Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-10500T vs Xeon E5-2687W FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-10500T vs Xeon E5-2687W: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-10500T
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $1,659 less on MSRP ($226 MSRP vs $1,885 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 742.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 5.3 PassMark/$ ($226 MSRP vs $1,885 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 150W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2687W across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2687W, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon E5-2687W
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,036 vs 10,140).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 44.9 PassMark/$ ($1,885 MSRP vs $226 MSRP).
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10500T better than Xeon E5-2687W?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10500T vs Xeon E5-2687W Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10500T
The Core i5-10500T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 10,140 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2687W
The Xeon E5-2687W is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 10,036 points. Launch price was $815.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10500T packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2687W offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2687W has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-10500T versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2687W — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2687W is built on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-10500T scores 10,140 against the Xeon E5-2687W's 10,036 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-10500T. L3 cache: 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i5-10500T vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2687W.
| Feature | Core i5-10500T | Xeon E5-2687W |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.1 GHz+35% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 20480 kB (total)+67% |
| L2 Cache | — | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | — | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) |
| PassMark | 10,140+1% | 10,036 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10500T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2687W uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10500T | Xeon E5-2687W |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-10500T was priced at $226, while the Xeon E5-2687W came in at $1885. On launch pricing ($226 vs $1885), Core i5-10500T was $1659 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10500T delivers 44.9 pts/$ vs 5.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2687W — making the Core i5-10500T the 157.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10500T | Xeon E5-2687W |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $226-88% | $1885 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.9+747% | 5.3 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















