
Core i5-10505
Popular choices:

Core i7-8700B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10505
2021Why buy it
- ✅+1.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $111 less on MSRP ($192 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 60.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 62.5 vs 38.9 PassMark/$ ($192 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-8700B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-8700B
2018Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i5-10505 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,795 vs 12,009).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.9 vs 62.5 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).
Core i5-10505
2021Core i7-8700B
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $111 less on MSRP ($192 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 60.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 62.5 vs 38.9 PassMark/$ ($192 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i5-10505 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-8700B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,795 vs 12,009).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.9 vs 62.5 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10505 better than Core i7-8700B?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10505 | Core i7-8700B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10505 | Core i7-8700B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 248 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 286 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 225 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 183 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10505 | Core i7-8700B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 240 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10505 | Core i7-8700B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10505 and Core i7-8700B

Core i5-10505
Core i5-10505
The Core i5-10505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2021 (4 years ago). It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 12,009 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-8700B
Core i7-8700B
The Core i7-8700B is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 11,795 points. Launch price was $303.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-10505 and Core i7-8700B share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-10505 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i7-8700B — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-8700B is built on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-10505 scores 12,009 against the Core i7-8700B's 11,795 — a 1.8% lead for the Core i5-10505. L3 cache: 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i5-10505 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-8700B.
| Feature | Core i5-10505 | Core i7-8700B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | — | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | — | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) |
| PassMark | 12,009+2% | 11,795 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10505 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-8700B uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10505 | Core i7-8700B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-10505) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-8700B). The Core i7-8700B includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i5-10505 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-8700B targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core i5-10505 | Core i7-8700B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-10505 launched at $192 MSRP, while the Core i7-8700B debuted at $303. On MSRP ($192 vs $303), the Core i5-10505 is $111 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10505 delivers 62.5 pts/$ vs 38.9 pts/$ for the Core i7-8700B — making the Core i5-10505 the 46.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10505 | Core i7-8700B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $192-37% | $303 |
| Performance per Dollar | 62.5+61% | 38.9 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












