
Core i5-11400F

Core Ultra 5 228V
Core i5-11400F vs Core Ultra 5 228V Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-11400F vs Core Ultra 5 228V FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-11400F vs Core Ultra 5 228V: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-11400F
2021Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Costs $138 less on MSRP ($157 MSRP vs $295 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 87.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 107.7 vs 57.5 PassMark/$ ($157 MSRP vs $295 MSRP).
- ✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Included), unlike Core Ultra 5 228V.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 228V across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (7,600 vs 10,053).
- ❌282.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 17W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 228V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 228V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 5 228V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 65W, a 48W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc 130V, while Core i5-11400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 57.5 vs 107.7 PassMark/$ ($295 MSRP vs $157 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-11400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 228V better than Core i5-11400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-11400F vs Core Ultra 5 228V Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-11400F
The Core i5-11400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,902 points. Launch price was $157.

Core Ultra 5 228V
The Core Ultra 5 228V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,955 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-11400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 228V offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core Ultra 5 228V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-11400F versus 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 228V — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 228V (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-11400F uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 228V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11400F scores 16,902 against the Core Ultra 5 228V's 16,955 — a 0.3% lead for the Core Ultra 5 228V. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,000 vs 2,585, a 25.5% lead for the Core Ultra 5 228V that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,600 vs 10,053 (27.8% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 228V). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11400F vs 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 228V.
| Feature | Core i5-11400F | Core Ultra 5 228V |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 8+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+24% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+10140% | 2.5 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 3 nm-79% |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake (2021) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
| PassMark | 16,902 | 16,955 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,932 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,000 | 2,585+29% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,600 | 10,053+32% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-11400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 5 228V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-11400F versus LPDDR5X-8533 on the Core Ultra 5 228V — the Core Ultra 5 228V supports 166.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-11400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-11400F) vs 8 (Core Ultra 5 228V) — the Core i5-11400F offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B560,Z590 (Core i5-11400F) and SoC (Core Ultra 5 228V).
| Feature | Core i5-11400F | Core Ultra 5 228V |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FCBGA2833 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | LPDDR5X-8533+167% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+300% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+150% | 8 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-11400F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-11400F) vs Yes (Core Ultra 5 228V). The Core Ultra 5 228V includes integrated graphics (Arc 130V), while the Core i5-11400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11400F targets Mainstream Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-11400F | Core Ultra 5 228V |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Arc 130V |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
| Target Use | Mainstream Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-11400F was priced at $157, while the Core Ultra 5 228V came in at $295. On launch pricing ($157 vs $295), Core i5-11400F was $138 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-11400F delivers 107.7 pts/$ vs 57.5 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 228V — making the Core i5-11400F the 60.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-11400F | Core Ultra 5 228V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $157-47% | $295 |
| Performance per Dollar | 107.7+87% | 57.5 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














