Core i5-11400F vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

Core i5-11400F vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U Performance Spectrum

Core i5-11400F

6 / 12

16,902

+1.4%

16,666

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-11400F vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-11400F vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-11400F

2021

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Included), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $157 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (16,666 vs 16,902).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-11400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U better than Core i5-11400F?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is ahead with a 24.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-11400F pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark. Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-11400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-11400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $157 MSRP, and it still gives you a 24.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-11400F is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.4% better PassMark. Core i5-11400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (107.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-11400F vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-11400F

The Core i5-11400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,902 points. Launch price was $157.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

The Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 16,666 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-11400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-11400F versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-11400F uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U uses Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11400F scores 16,902 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U's 16,666 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i5-11400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U.

Feature	Core i5-11400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.5 GHz+2%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+30%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	7 nm-50%
Architecture	Rocket Lake (2021)	Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022)
PassMark	16,902+1%	16,666
Geekbench 6 Single	2,000	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-11400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-11400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
Socket	LGA1200	FP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-11400F) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U). Primary use case: Core i5-11400F targets Mainstream Desktop.