
Core i5-11400F

Xeon Gold 5118
Core i5-11400F vs Xeon Gold 5118 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-11400F vs Xeon Gold 5118 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-11400F vs Xeon Gold 5118: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-11400F
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Included), unlike Xeon Gold 5118.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5118 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 17 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5118, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $157 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5118 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 5118
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (17 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,744 vs 16,902).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-11400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-11400F better than Xeon Gold 5118?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-11400F vs Xeon Gold 5118 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-11400F
The Core i5-11400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,902 points. Launch price was $157.

Xeon Gold 5118
The Xeon Gold 5118 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 16,744 points. Launch price was $1,273.
Processing Power
The Core i5-11400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5118 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Gold 5118 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-11400F versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5118 — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-11400F (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-11400F uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5118 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11400F scores 16,902 against the Xeon Gold 5118's 16,744 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-11400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11400F vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 5118.
| Feature | Core i5-11400F | Xeon Gold 5118 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+38% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+13% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16.5 MB+38% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+2033% | 12 MB |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake (2021) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 16,902 | 16,744 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,600 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-11400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5118 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-11400F versus 2400 on the Xeon Gold 5118 — the Core i5-11400F supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5118 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-11400F) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 5118). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-11400F) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 5118) — the Xeon Gold 5118 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B560,Z590 (Core i5-11400F) and C621 (Xeon Gold 5118).
| Feature | Core i5-11400F | Xeon Gold 5118 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+33% | 2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 768 GB+500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 48+140% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-11400F targets Mainstream Desktop. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5118 rivals EPYC 7301.
| Feature | Core i5-11400F | Xeon Gold 5118 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Mainstream Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













