Core i5-11400H vs Xeon E-2286M

Intel

Core i5-11400H

6 Cores12 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2021

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon E-2286M

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-11400H

2021

Why buy it

  • +1.2% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 11th Gen 16EU, while Xeon E-2286M needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2286M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2286M, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Xeon E-2286M

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (15,080 vs 15,262).
  • 28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11400H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-11400H better than Xeon E-2286M?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E-2286M makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-11400H is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-11400H is the better fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-11400H still looks like the safer overall buy. Core i5-11400H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 1.2% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-11400H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019), more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-11400HXeon E-2286M
1080p
low187 FPS252 FPS
medium154 FPS235 FPS
high127 FPS196 FPS
ultra104 FPS169 FPS
1440p
low151 FPS224 FPS
medium120 FPS189 FPS
high98 FPS153 FPS
ultra80 FPS135 FPS
4K
low85 FPS156 FPS
medium73 FPS133 FPS
high58 FPS102 FPS
ultra45 FPS90 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-11400HXeon E-2286M
1080p
low382 FPS377 FPS
medium310 FPS335 FPS
high275 FPS298 FPS
ultra237 FPS264 FPS
1440p
low341 FPS356 FPS
medium279 FPS313 FPS
high254 FPS276 FPS
ultra218 FPS235 FPS
4K
low282 FPS239 FPS
medium236 FPS216 FPS
high216 FPS209 FPS
ultra182 FPS177 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-11400HXeon E-2286M
1080p
low382 FPS377 FPS
medium382 FPS377 FPS
high382 FPS377 FPS
ultra382 FPS377 FPS
1440p
low382 FPS377 FPS
medium382 FPS377 FPS
high382 FPS377 FPS
ultra382 FPS359 FPS
4K
low382 FPS377 FPS
medium378 FPS377 FPS
high325 FPS338 FPS
ultra256 FPS272 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-11400HXeon E-2286M
1080p
low382 FPS377 FPS
medium382 FPS377 FPS
high382 FPS377 FPS
ultra382 FPS377 FPS
1440p
low382 FPS377 FPS
medium382 FPS377 FPS
high382 FPS377 FPS
ultra382 FPS377 FPS
4K
low382 FPS377 FPS
medium382 FPS377 FPS
high382 FPS377 FPS
ultra382 FPS351 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-11400H and Xeon E-2286M

Intel

Core i5-11400H

The Core i5-11400H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,262 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon E-2286M

The Xeon E-2286M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 May 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 15,080 points. Launch price was $623.

Processing Power

The Core i5-11400H packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E-2286M offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E-2286M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-11400H versus 5 GHz on the Xeon E-2286M — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2286M (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-11400H uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon E-2286M uses Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11400H scores 15,262 against the Xeon E-2286M's 15,080 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-11400H. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11400H vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2286M.

FeatureCore i5-11400HXeon E-2286M
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz
5 GHz+11%
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+13%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+400%
256 kB (per core)
Process
10 nm SuperFin-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Tiger Lake-H (2021)
Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)
PassMark
15,262+1%
15,080
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,150
Geekbench 6 Single
1,900
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-11400H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2286M uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-11400HXeon E-2286M
Socket
FCBGA1787
BGA1440
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-11400H) / not specified (Xeon E-2286M). The Core i5-11400H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 11th Gen 16EU), while the Xeon E-2286M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11400H targets Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-11400H rivals Ryzen 5 5600H.

FeatureCore i5-11400HXeon E-2286M
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 11th Gen 16EU
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming Laptop