
Core i5-11400H
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5115
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-11400H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 85W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 11th Gen 16EU, while Xeon Gold 5115 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5115, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
Xeon Gold 5115
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-11400H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,017 vs 15,262).
- ❌142.9% higher power demand at 85W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11400H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-11400H
2021Xeon Gold 5115
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 85W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 11th Gen 16EU, while Xeon Gold 5115 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5115, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-11400H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,017 vs 15,262).
- ❌142.9% higher power demand at 85W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11400H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-11400H better than Xeon Gold 5115?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-11400H | Xeon Gold 5115 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-11400H | Xeon Gold 5115 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 382 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 254 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 95 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-11400H | Xeon Gold 5115 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 382 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 382 FPS | 375 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 375 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 382 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 382 FPS | 375 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 375 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 382 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 378 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 325 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-11400H | Xeon Gold 5115 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 382 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 382 FPS | 375 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 375 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 382 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 382 FPS | 375 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 375 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 382 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 382 FPS | 375 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 337 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-11400H and Xeon Gold 5115

Core i5-11400H
Core i5-11400H
The Core i5-11400H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,262 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 5115
Xeon Gold 5115
The Xeon Gold 5115 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 13.75 MB. L2 cache: 10 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 15,017 points. Launch price was $1,221.
Processing Power
The Core i5-11400H packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5115 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon Gold 5115 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-11400H versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5115 — a 33.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-11400H (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-11400H uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon Gold 5115 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11400H scores 15,262 against the Xeon Gold 5115's 15,017 — a 1.6% lead for the Core i5-11400H. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11400H vs 13.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 5115.
| Feature | Core i5-11400H | Xeon Gold 5115 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 20+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+41% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+13% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 13.75 MB+15% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 10 MB+700% |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-H (2021) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 15,262+2% | 15,017 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 8,150 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,900 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 6,500 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-11400H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5115 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-11400H | Xeon Gold 5115 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1787 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-11400H) / not specified (Xeon Gold 5115). The Core i5-11400H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 11th Gen 16EU), while the Xeon Gold 5115 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11400H targets Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-11400H rivals Ryzen 5 5600H.
| Feature | Core i5-11400H | Xeon Gold 5115 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 11th Gen 16EU | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












