
Core i5-11500H

Xeon w3-2423
Core i5-11500H vs Xeon w3-2423 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-11500H vs Xeon w3-2423 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-11500H vs Xeon w3-2423: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-11500H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 750 (32 EU), while Xeon w3-2423 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,669 vs 15,797).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 15 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1787 with DDR4, while Xeon w3-2423 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon w3-2423
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1787 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-11500H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $359 MSRP, while Core i5-11500H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11500H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w3-2423 better than Core i5-11500H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-11500H vs Xeon w3-2423 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-11500H
The Core i5-11500H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake H45 (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,669 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon w3-2423
The Xeon w3-2423 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 15,797 points. Launch price was $359.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-11500H and Xeon w3-2423 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-11500H versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon w3-2423 — a 9.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-11500H (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-11500H uses the Tiger Lake H45 (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon w3-2423 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11500H scores 15,669 against the Xeon w3-2423's 15,797 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon w3-2423. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11500H vs 15 MB on the Xeon w3-2423.
| Feature | Core i5-11500H | Xeon w3-2423 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+10% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+38% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 15 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake H45 (2021) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 15,669 | 15,797 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,532 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,801 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 6,248 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-11500H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w3-2423 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-11500H | Xeon w3-2423 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1787 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-11500H) / not specified (Xeon w3-2423). The Core i5-11500H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 750 (32 EU)), while the Xeon w3-2423 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11500H targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-11500H rivals Ryzen 5 5600H.
| Feature | Core i5-11500H | Xeon w3-2423 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 750 (32 EU) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













