
Core i5-11600K

Xeon W-11865MRE
Core i5-11600K vs Xeon W-11865MRE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-11600K vs Xeon W-11865MRE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-11600K vs Xeon W-11865MRE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-11600K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $338 less on MSRP ($262 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 128.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 74.5 vs 32.6 PassMark/$ ($262 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 750, while Xeon W-11865MRE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,520 vs 19,589).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-11865MRE, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Xeon W-11865MRE
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-11600K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.6 vs 74.5 PassMark/$ ($600 MSRP vs $262 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-11865MRE better than Core i5-11600K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-11600K vs Xeon W-11865MRE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-11600K
The Core i5-11600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,520 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-11865MRE
The Xeon W-11865MRE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 August 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,589 points. Launch price was $480.
Processing Power
The Core i5-11600K packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-11865MRE offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon W-11865MRE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i5-11600K versus 4.7 GHz on the Xeon W-11865MRE — a 4.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-11600K (base: 3.9 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-11600K uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-11865MRE uses Tiger Lake-H (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11600K scores 19,520 against the Xeon W-11865MRE's 19,589 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon W-11865MRE. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11600K vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon W-11865MRE.
| Feature | Core i5-11600K | Xeon W-11865MRE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+4% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz+86% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+20380% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake (2021) | Tiger Lake-H (2021) |
| PassMark | 19,520 | 19,589 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-11600K uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-11865MRE uses FCBGA1787 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-11600K | Xeon W-11865MRE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FCBGA1787 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-11600K) / not specified (Xeon W-11865MRE). The Core i5-11600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 750), while the Xeon W-11865MRE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11600K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-11600K | Xeon W-11865MRE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 750 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-11600K was priced at $262, while the Xeon W-11865MRE came in at $600. On launch pricing ($262 vs $600), Core i5-11600K was $338 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-11600K delivers 74.5 pts/$ vs 32.6 pts/$ for the Xeon W-11865MRE — making the Core i5-11600K the 78.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-11600K | Xeon W-11865MRE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $262-56% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 74.5+129% | 32.6 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














