
Core i5-1240U
Popular choices:

Core i7-1265U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-1240U
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 15W, a 6W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (14 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while Core i7-1265U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-1265U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Core i7-1265U
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,282 vs 13,387).
- ❌57.9% higher power demand at 15W vs 9.5W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1240U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-1240U
2022Core i7-1265U
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 15W, a 6W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (14 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while Core i7-1265U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-1265U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,282 vs 13,387).
- ❌57.9% higher power demand at 15W vs 9.5W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1240U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-1240U better than Core i7-1265U?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-1240U | Core i7-1265U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 182 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-1240U | Core i7-1265U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 208 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 107 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-1240U | Core i7-1265U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 335 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 335 FPS | 332 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 335 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 335 FPS | 332 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 335 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 332 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-1240U | Core i7-1265U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 335 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 335 FPS | 332 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 335 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 335 FPS | 332 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 335 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 335 FPS | 332 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1240U and Core i7-1265U

Core i5-1240U
Core i5-1240U
The Core i5-1240U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1781. Thermal design power (TDP): 9.5 MB + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,387 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-1265U
Core i7-1265U
The Core i7-1265U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,282 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-1240U and Core i7-1265U share an identical 10-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-1240U versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-1265U — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-1265U (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). Both are built on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture using a Intel 7 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-1240U scores 13,387 against the Core i7-1265U's 13,282 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-1240U. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-1240U | Core i7-1265U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12 | 10 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 1.8 GHz+64% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-U (2022) | Alder Lake-U (2022) |
| PassMark | 13,387 | 13,282 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,650 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1240U uses the FCBGA1781 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-1265U uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-1240U | Core i7-1265U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1781 | FCBGA1744 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-5200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 14 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-1240U) / not specified (Core i7-1265U). The Core i5-1240U includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 80EU), while the Core i7-1265U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1240U targets Thin & Light Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-1240U rivals Ryzen 5 5600U.
| Feature | Core i5-1240U | Core i7-1265U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Thin & Light Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












