Core i5-12500H vs EPYC 8024P

Core i5-12500H vs EPYC 8024P Performance Spectrum

Core i5-12500H

12 / 16

20,462

0.0%

20,455

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-12500H vs EPYC 8024P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-12500H vs EPYC 8024P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-12500H

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 90W, a 45W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while EPYC 8024P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).

EPYC 8024P

2023

Why buy it

✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12500H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (20,455 vs 20,462).
❌100% higher power demand at 90W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-12500H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-12500H better than EPYC 8024P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 8024P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-12500H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-12500H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-12500H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-12500H still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-12500H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8024P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022) and 77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-12500H vs EPYC 8024P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12500H

The Core i5-12500H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,462 points. Launch price was $299.

EPYC 8024P

The EPYC 8024P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,455 points. Launch price was $409.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-12500H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 8024P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-12500H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-12500H versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 8024P — a 40% clock advantage for the Core i5-12500H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-12500H uses the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 8024P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12500H scores 20,462 against the EPYC 8024P's 20,455 — a 0% lead for the Core i5-12500H. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12500H vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 8024P.

Feature	Core i5-12500H	EPYC 8024P
Cores / Threads	12 / 16+50%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+50%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+4%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+78%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Alder Lake-H (2022)	Siena (2023−2024)
PassMark	20,462	20,455
Geekbench 6 Single	2,260	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,900	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12500H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 8024P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-12500H	EPYC 8024P
Socket	FCBGA1744	SP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-12500H) / not specified (EPYC 8024P). The Core i5-12500H includes integrated graphics (Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU), while the EPYC 8024P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12500H targets Performance Laptop.