
Core i5-12500H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 8640U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12500H
2022Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,260 vs 2,519).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,900 vs 10,308).
- ❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
Ryzen 5 8640U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+11.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i5-12500H
2022Ryzen 5 8640U
2023Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅+11.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,260 vs 2,519).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,900 vs 10,308).
- ❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 8640U better than Core i5-12500H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12500H | Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12500H | Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 512 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 272 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 361 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 291 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 161 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12500H | Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 512 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 512 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 420 FPS | 507 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 512 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 443 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 449 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 435 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 267 FPS | 308 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12500H | Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 512 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 512 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 512 FPS | 507 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 512 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 512 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 507 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 463 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 380 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12500H and Ryzen 5 8640U

Core i5-12500H
Core i5-12500H
The Core i5-12500H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,462 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 8640U
Ryzen 5 8640U
The Ryzen 5 8640U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,274 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12500H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 8640U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-12500H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-12500H versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640U — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8640U (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-12500H uses the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 8640U uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12500H scores 20,462 against the Ryzen 5 8640U's 20,274 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-12500H. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,260 vs 2,519, a 10.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 8640U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,900 vs 10,308 (4% advantage for the Ryzen 5 8640U). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12500H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8640U.
| Feature | Core i5-12500H | Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16+100% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.9 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-H (2022) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 20,462 | 20,274 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 10,675 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,260 | 2,519+11% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,900 | 10,308+4% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12500H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 8640U uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Ryzen 5 8640U supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Adler Lake-H PCH (Core i5-12500H) and SoC (Ryzen 5 8640U).
| Feature | Core i5-12500H | Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | LPDDR5x-7500 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 256 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen 5 8640U supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-12500H) vs AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 5 8640U). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Core i5-12500H) and Radeon 760M (Ryzen 5 8640U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12500H targets Performance Laptop, Ryzen 5 8640U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 8640U rivals Core i5-1335U.
| Feature | Core i5-12500H | Ryzen 5 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU | Radeon 760M |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V (SVM) |
| Target Use | Performance Laptop | Productivity |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












