Core i5-12500H vs Xeon D-1747NTE

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-12500H vs Xeon D-1747NTE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-12500H vs Xeon D-1747NTE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-12500H

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+20% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 15 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 80W, a 35W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2227 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1747NTE, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.

Xeon D-1747NTE

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12500H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (20,279 vs 20,462).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 18 MB).
❌77.8% higher power demand at 80W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA2227 with DDR4, while Core i5-12500H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-12500H better than Xeon D-1747NTE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1747NTE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-12500H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-12500H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 17.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-12500H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 20% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 15 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-12500H still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-12500H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-12500H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA2227, 20% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 15 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 16 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-12500H vs Xeon D-1747NTE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12500H

The Core i5-12500H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,462 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-1747NTE

The Xeon D-1747NTE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,279 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-12500H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-1747NTE offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Core i5-12500H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-12500H versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1747NTE — a 25% clock advantage for the Core i5-12500H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-12500H is built on the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-12500H scores 20,462 against the Xeon D-1747NTE's 20,279 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-12500H. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12500H vs 15 MB on the Xeon D-1747NTE.

Feature	Core i5-12500H	Xeon D-1747NTE
Cores / Threads	12 / 16+20%	10 / 20
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+29%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)+20%	15 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	—
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-H (2022)	—
PassMark	20,462	20,279
Geekbench 6 Single	2,260	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,900	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12500H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-1747NTE uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-12500H	Xeon D-1747NTE
Socket	FCBGA1744	FCBGA2227
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-12500H) / not specified (Xeon D-1747NTE). The Core i5-12500H includes integrated graphics (Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU), while the Xeon D-1747NTE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12500H targets Performance Laptop.