Core i5-12500H vs Xeon E5-4667 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-12500H vs Xeon E5-4667 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-12500H vs Xeon E5-4667 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-12500H

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 135W, a 90W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while Xeon E5-4667 v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 45 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4667 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.

Xeon E5-4667 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+150% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12500H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (20,319 vs 20,462).
❌200% higher power demand at 135W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i5-12500H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-12500H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-12500H better than Xeon E5-4667 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4667 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-12500H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-12500H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-12500H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-12500H still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-12500H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-12500H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 16 threads instead of 18/36. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-12500H vs Xeon E5-4667 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12500H

The Core i5-12500H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,462 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-4667 v4

The Xeon E5-4667 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,319 points. Launch price was $5,729.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-12500H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-4667 v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-12500H versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4667 v4 — a 40% clock advantage for the Core i5-12500H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-12500H uses the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12500H scores 20,462 against the Xeon E5-4667 v4's 20,319 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-12500H. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12500H vs 45 MB on the Xeon E5-4667 v4.

Feature	Core i5-12500H	Xeon E5-4667 v4
Cores / Threads	12 / 16	18 / 36+50%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+50%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+14%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)	45 MB+150%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	4.5 MB+260%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-H (2022)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	20,462	20,319
Geekbench 6 Single	2,260	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,900	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12500H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-12500H	Xeon E5-4667 v4
Socket	FCBGA1744	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-12500H) / not specified (Xeon E5-4667 v4). The Core i5-12500H includes integrated graphics (Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU), while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12500H targets Performance Laptop.