
Core i5-12500T

Xeon E5-4650 v4
Core i5-12500T vs Xeon E5-4650 v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-12500T vs Xeon E5-4650 v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-12500T vs Xeon E5-4650 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-12500T
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon E5-4650 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Included), unlike Xeon E5-4650 v4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 35 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4650 v4, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $302 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4650 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-4650 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+94.4% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,225 vs 16,339).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i5-12500T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-12500T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12500T.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12500T better than Xeon E5-4650 v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12500T vs Xeon E5-4650 v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12500T
The Core i5-12500T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 16,339 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-4650 v4
The Xeon E5-4650 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,225 points. Launch price was $3,838.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12500T packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4650 v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-4650 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12500T versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-4650 v4 — a 44.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-12500T (base: 2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-12500T uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-4650 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12500T scores 16,339 against the Xeon E5-4650 v4's 16,225 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-12500T. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12500T vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-4650 v4.
| Feature | Core i5-12500T | Xeon E5-4650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 14 / 28+133% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+57% | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 35 MB+94% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 3.5 MB+180% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 16,339 | 16,225 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 6,625 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,300 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,900 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12500T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-4650 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12500T | Xeon E5-4650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-12500T) / not specified (Xeon E5-4650 v4). The Core i5-12500T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon E5-4650 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12500T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-12500T rivals Ryzen 5 5600GE.
| Feature | Core i5-12500T | Xeon E5-4650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Low Power Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













