Core i5-1250P vs Ryzen 9 4900H

Core i5-1250P vs Ryzen 9 4900H Performance Spectrum

Core i5-1250P

12 / 16

19,167

+1.5%

18,887

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-1250P vs Ryzen 9 4900H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-1250P vs Ryzen 9 4900H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-1250P

2022

Why buy it

✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 4900H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Ryzen 9 4900H

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (18,887 vs 19,167).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i5-1250P moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1250P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-1250P better than Ryzen 9 4900H?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 9 4900H is ahead with a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-1250P pulls ahead with 1.5% better PassMark. Core i5-1250P also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-1250P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-1250P still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-1250P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.5% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-1250P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of FP6, 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-1250P vs Ryzen 9 4900H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1250P

The Core i5-1250P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,167 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 9 4900H

The Ryzen 9 4900H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,887 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-1250P packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 4900H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-1250P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-1250P versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 4900H — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-1250P uses the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 4900H uses Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1250P scores 19,167 against the Ryzen 9 4900H's 18,887 — a 1.5% lead for the Core i5-1250P. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-1250P vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 4900H.

Feature	Core i5-1250P	Ryzen 9 4900H
Cores / Threads	12 / 16+50%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	3.3 GHz+94%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-P (2022)	Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020)
PassMark	19,167+1%	18,887
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,250	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,785	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,420	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1250P uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 4900H uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-1250P	Ryzen 9 4900H
Socket	FCBGA1744	FP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-1250P) / not specified (Ryzen 9 4900H). The Core i5-1250P includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU)), while the Ryzen 9 4900H requires a dedicated GPU.