
Core i5-1250P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 4900H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-1250P
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 4900H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen 9 4900H
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,887 vs 19,167).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i5-1250P moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1250P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-1250P
2022Ryzen 9 4900H
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 4900H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,887 vs 19,167).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i5-1250P moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1250P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-1250P better than Ryzen 9 4900H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-1250P | Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-1250P | Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 185 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-1250P | Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 472 FPS |
| ultra | 406 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 472 FPS |
| ultra | 367 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 435 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 395 FPS |
| high | 315 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 282 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-1250P | Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 472 FPS |
| ultra | 479 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 472 FPS |
| ultra | 448 FPS | 455 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 327 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1250P and Ryzen 9 4900H

Core i5-1250P
Core i5-1250P
The Core i5-1250P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,167 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 4900H
Ryzen 9 4900H
The Ryzen 9 4900H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,887 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-1250P packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 4900H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-1250P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-1250P versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 4900H — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-1250P uses the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 4900H uses Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1250P scores 19,167 against the Ryzen 9 4900H's 18,887 — a 1.5% lead for the Core i5-1250P. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-1250P vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 4900H.
| Feature | Core i5-1250P | Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 3.3 GHz+94% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-P (2022) | Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) |
| PassMark | 19,167+1% | 18,887 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,250 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,785 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,420 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1250P uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 4900H uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-1250P | Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-1250P) / not specified (Ryzen 9 4900H). The Core i5-1250P includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU)), while the Ryzen 9 4900H requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i5-1250P | Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













