
Core i5-12600HX
Popular choices:

M3 Pro 12-Core
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12600HX
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while M3 Pro 12-Core needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βFewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
M3 Pro 12-Core
2023Why buy it
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12600HX across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (24,170 vs 24,396).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-12600HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-12600HX
2022M3 Pro 12-Core
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while M3 Pro 12-Core needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- βFewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12600HX across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (24,170 vs 24,396).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-12600HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12600HX better than M3 Pro 12-Core?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12600HX | M3 Pro 12-Core |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12600HX | M3 Pro 12-Core |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 355 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 230 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 184 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12600HX | M3 Pro 12-Core |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 610 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 604 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 604 FPS |
| ultra | 420 FPS | 593 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 515 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 400 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 449 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 267 FPS | 248 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12600HX | M3 Pro 12-Core |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 610 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 610 FPS | 604 FPS |
| high | 610 FPS | 604 FPS |
| ultra | 588 FPS | 604 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 610 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 610 FPS | 604 FPS |
| high | 563 FPS | 540 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 494 FPS |
| medium | 463 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 342 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12600HX and M3 Pro 12-Core

Core i5-12600HX
Core i5-12600HX
The Core i5-12600HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,396 points. Launch price was $299.
M3 Pro 12-Core
M3 Pro 12-Core
The M3 Pro 12-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.748 GHz, with boost up to 4.06 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,170 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12600HX packs 12 cores / 16 threads, matching the M3 Pro 12-Core's 12 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-12600HX versus 4.06 GHz on the M3 Pro 12-Core β a 12.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-12600HX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.748 GHz). The Core i5-12600HX is built on the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-12600HX scores 24,396 against the M3 Pro 12-Core's 24,170 β a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-12600HX.
| Feature | Core i5-12600HX | M3 Pro 12-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16 | 12 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+13% | 4.06 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.748 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | β |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | β |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-HX (2022) | β |
| PassMark | 24,396 | 24,170 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,434 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12600HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M3 Pro 12-Core uses none (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12600HX | M3 Pro 12-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | Yes | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12600HX) / not specified (M3 Pro 12-Core). The Core i5-12600HX includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the M3 Pro 12-Core requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12600HX targets Workstation Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-12600HX rivals Ryzen 7 6800H.
| Feature | Core i5-12600HX | M3 Pro 12-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | β |
| Unlocked | Yes | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | β |
| Target Use | Workstation Laptop | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












