
Core 7 240H
Popular choices:

Core i5-12600HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 7 240H
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 55W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-12600HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-12600HX
2022Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core 7 240H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 7 240H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,396 vs 24,698).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌22.2% higher power demand at 55W vs 45W.
Core 7 240H
2024Core i5-12600HX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 55W, a 10W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core 7 240H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-12600HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 7 240H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,396 vs 24,698).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌22.2% higher power demand at 55W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 7 240H better than Core i5-12600HX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 7 240H | Core i5-12600HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 194 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 7 240H | Core i5-12600HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 465 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 415 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 602 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 509 FPS | 401 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 300 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 247 FPS | 203 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 7 240H | Core i5-12600HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 610 FPS |
| medium | 617 FPS | 519 FPS |
| high | 617 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 601 FPS | 420 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 567 FPS |
| medium | 617 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 578 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 449 FPS |
| medium | 489 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 267 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 7 240H | Core i5-12600HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 610 FPS |
| medium | 617 FPS | 610 FPS |
| high | 617 FPS | 610 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 588 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 610 FPS |
| medium | 617 FPS | 610 FPS |
| high | 617 FPS | 563 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 492 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 463 FPS |
| high | 502 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 361 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 7 240H and Core i5-12600HX

Core 7 240H
Core 7 240H
The Core 7 240H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 24,698 points. Launch price was $502.

Core i5-12600HX
Core i5-12600HX
The Core i5-12600HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,396 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core 7 240H packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i5-12600HX offers 12 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-12600HX has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core 7 240H versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-12600HX — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Core 7 240H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 7 240H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-12600HX uses Alder Lake-HX (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 7 240H scores 24,698 against the Core i5-12600HX's 24,396 — a 1.2% lead for the Core 7 240H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core 7 240H vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12600HX.
| Feature | Core 7 240H | Core i5-12600HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 12 / 16+20% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+13% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+33% | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Alder Lake-HX (2022) |
| PassMark | 24,698+1% | 24,396 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,434 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 7 240H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-12600HX uses FCBGA1964 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 7 240H | Core i5-12600HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1964 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 7 240H) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12600HX). The Core i5-12600HX includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core 7 240H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12600HX targets Workstation Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-12600HX rivals Ryzen 7 6800H.
| Feature | Core 7 240H | Core i5-12600HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Workstation Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













