Core 7 240H vs Ryzen AI 7 350

Core 7 240H vs Ryzen AI 7 350 Performance Spectrum

Core 7 240H

10 / 16

24,698

0.0%

24,897

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 7 240H vs Ryzen AI 7 350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 7 240H vs Ryzen AI 7 350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 7 240H

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,698 vs 24,897).
❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.

Ryzen AI 7 350

2025

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 7 240H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 24 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI 7 350 better than Core 7 240H?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 7 240H is ahead with a 20.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI 7 350 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Core 7 240H also has the bigger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI 7 350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI 7 350 still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen AI 7 350 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI 7 350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 10/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 7 240H vs Ryzen AI 7 350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 7 240H

The Core 7 240H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 24,698 points. Launch price was $502.

Ryzen AI 7 350

The Ryzen AI 7 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,897 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 7 240H packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen AI 7 350 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core 7 240H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core 7 240H versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 7 350 — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Core 7 240H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core 7 240H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen AI 7 350 uses Krackan Point (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core 7 240H scores 24,698 against the Ryzen AI 7 350's 24,897 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen AI 7 350. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core 7 240H vs 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 7 350.

Feature	Core 7 240H	Ryzen AI 7 350
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+4%	5 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+25%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)+200%	8 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	4 nm-60%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Krackan Point (2025)
PassMark	24,698	24,897

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 7 240H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI 7 350 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.