Core 7 240H vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 380

Core 7 240H vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 Performance Spectrum

Core 7 240H

10 / 16

24,698

+0.3%

24,613

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 7 240H vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 7 240H vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 7 240H

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 55W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 380

2025

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 7 240H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (24,613 vs 24,698).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Core 7 240H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌22.2% higher power demand at 55W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 7 240H better than Ryzen AI Max PRO 380?

Yes. Core 7 240H is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 7 240H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 7 240H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 7 240H is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core 7 240H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $400 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 14.9% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 7 240H vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 7 240H

The Core 7 240H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 24,698 points. Launch price was $502.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 380

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,613 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 7 240H packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core 7 240H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core 7 240H versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Core 7 240H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core 7 240H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core 7 240H scores 24,698 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380's 24,613 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 7 240H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core 7 240H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380.

Feature	Core 7 240H	Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+67%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+6%	4.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.6 GHz+44%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)+50%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	4 nm-60%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark	24,698	24,613

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 7 240H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.