Core 7 240H vs Xeon Gold 6143

Intel

Core 7 240H

10 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6143

16 Cores32 Thrd205 WWMax: 4 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······

Core 7 240H vs Xeon Gold 6143 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 7 240H vs Xeon Gold 6143 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 7 240H vs Xeon Gold 6143: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 7 240H

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +17.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 45W instead of 205W, a 160W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (24,698 vs 24,786).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6143, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.

Xeon Gold 6143

2017

Why buy it

  • +0.4% higher PassMark.
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 7 240H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Launch MSRP is still $342 MSRP, while Core 7 240H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 355.6% higher power demand at 205W vs 45W.
  • Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core 7 240H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 7 240H better than Xeon Gold 6143?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 6143 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core 7 240H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6143 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core 7 240H is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Gold 6143 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core 7 240H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $342 MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6143 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. Xeon Gold 6143 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (72.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 7 240H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core 7 240H vs Xeon Gold 6143 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core 7 240H

The Core 7 240H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 24,698 points. Launch price was $502.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6143

The Xeon Gold 6143 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,786 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core 7 240H packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6143 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6143 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core 7 240H versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6143 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Core 7 240H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core 7 240H is built on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core 7 240H scores 24,698 against the Xeon Gold 6143's 24,786 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon Gold 6143. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core 7 240H vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6143.

FeatureCore 7 240HXeon Gold 6143
Cores / Threads
10 / 16
16 / 32+60%
Boost Clock
5.2 GHz+30%
4 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz+12%
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)+9%
22 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
PassMark
24,698
24,786
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 7 240H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6143 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 7 240HXeon Gold 6143
Socket
FCBGA1744
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0