Core 7 240H vs Core i9-11900KF

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 7 240H vs Core i9-11900KF FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 7 240H vs Core i9-11900KF: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 7 240H

2024

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11900KF across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Core i9-11900KF

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,585 vs 24,698).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $513 MSRP, while Core 7 240H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core 7 240H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 7 240H better than Core i9-11900KF?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i9-11900KF is ahead with a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 7 240H pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Core 7 240H also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 7 240H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 7 240H is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i9-11900KF is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core 7 240H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $513 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i9-11900KF is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i9-11900KF is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (47.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 7 240H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core 7 240H vs Core i9-11900KF Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 7 240H

The Core 7 240H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 24,698 points. Launch price was $502.

Core i9-11900KF

The Core i9-11900KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 24,585 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 7 240H packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i9-11900KF offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core 7 240H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core 7 240H versus 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-11900KF — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core 7 240H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i9-11900KF uses Rocket Lake (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 7 240H scores 24,698 against the Core i9-11900KF's 24,585 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 7 240H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core 7 240H vs 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-11900KF.

Feature	Core 7 240H	Core i9-11900KF
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz	5.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.5 GHz+40%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)+50%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+12700%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Rocket Lake (2021)
PassMark	24,698	24,585
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	15,500

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 7 240H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-11900KF uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core 7 240H	Core i9-11900KF
Socket	FCBGA1744	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	—	128 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	20