Core 7 240H vs Xeon E5-2699 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 7 240H vs Xeon E5-2699 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 7 240H vs Xeon E5-2699 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 7 240H

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 145W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,698 vs 24,711).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 55 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699 v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2699 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅+129.2% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 7 240H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $4,115 MSRP, while Core 7 240H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌222.2% higher power demand at 145W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core 7 240H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 7 240H better than Xeon E5-2699 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2699 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core 7 240H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2699 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 22 cores and 44 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 129.2% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 7 240H is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2699 v4 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core 7 240H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $4,115 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2699 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2699 v4 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 7 240H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2016) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core 7 240H vs Xeon E5-2699 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 7 240H

The Core 7 240H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 24,698 points. Launch price was $502.

Xeon E5-2699 v4

The Xeon E5-2699 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB. L2 cache: 5.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,711 points. Launch price was $4,115.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 7 240H packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon E5-2699 v4 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core 7 240H versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699 v4 — a 36.4% clock advantage for the Core 7 240H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core 7 240H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 7 240H scores 24,698 against the Xeon E5-2699 v4's 24,711 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2699 v4. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core 7 240H vs 55 MB on the Xeon E5-2699 v4.

Feature	Core 7 240H	Xeon E5-2699 v4
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	22 / 44+120%
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+44%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+14%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	55 MB+129%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	5.5 MB+175%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	24,698	24,711

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 7 240H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.