
Core i5-12600K
Popular choices:

EPYC 72F3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12600K
2021Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 180W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 72F3 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 72F3 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $289 MSRP, while EPYC 72F3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
EPYC 72F3
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,252 vs 27,586).
- ❌44% higher power demand at 180W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i5-12600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-12600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-12600K
2021EPYC 72F3
2021Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 180W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 72F3 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 72F3 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $289 MSRP, while EPYC 72F3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,252 vs 27,586).
- ❌44% higher power demand at 180W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i5-12600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-12600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12600K better than EPYC 72F3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12600K | EPYC 72F3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 311 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12600K | EPYC 72F3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 576 FPS | 583 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 466 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 411 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 362 FPS |
| ultra | 305 FPS | 300 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 220 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12600K | EPYC 72F3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 690 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 635 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 681 FPS |
| ultra | 476 FPS | 681 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 690 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 597 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 534 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 466 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 277 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12600K | EPYC 72F3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 690 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 690 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 690 FPS | 681 FPS |
| ultra | 644 FPS | 681 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 690 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 599 FPS | 655 FPS |
| ultra | 526 FPS | 565 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 542 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 495 FPS | 574 FPS |
| high | 444 FPS | 499 FPS |
| ultra | 389 FPS | 427 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12600K and EPYC 72F3

Core i5-12600K
Core i5-12600K
The Core i5-12600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,586 points. Launch price was $289.

EPYC 72F3
EPYC 72F3
The EPYC 72F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,252 points. Launch price was $2,468.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12600K packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 72F3 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-12600K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i5-12600K versus 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 72F3 — a 17.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-12600K (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i5-12600K uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 72F3 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the Core i5-12600K scores 27,586 against the EPYC 72F3's 27,252 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-12600K. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-12600K vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 72F3.
| Feature | Core i5-12600K | EPYC 72F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+20% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+1180% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Architecture | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 27,586+1% | 27,252 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,472 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,863 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 72F3 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12600K | EPYC 72F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-12600K) / not specified (EPYC 72F3). The Core i5-12600K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 72F3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12600K targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-12600K rivals Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i5-12600K | EPYC 72F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













