
Core i5-1334U
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 5 134U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-1334U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while Core Ultra 5 134U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core Ultra 5 134U
2023Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-1334U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,169 vs 13,265).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1334U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-1334U
2023Core Ultra 5 134U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while Core Ultra 5 134U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-1334U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,169 vs 13,265).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1334U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-1334U better than Core Ultra 5 134U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-1334U | Core Ultra 5 134U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-1334U | Core Ultra 5 134U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 101 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-1334U | Core Ultra 5 134U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 283 FPS | 265 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-1334U | Core Ultra 5 134U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 329 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1334U and Core Ultra 5 134U

Core i5-1334U
Core i5-1334U
The Core i5-1334U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 13,265 points. Launch price was $340.

Core Ultra 5 134U
Core Ultra 5 134U
The Core Ultra 5 134U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 0.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2551. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,169 points. Launch price was $332.
Processing Power
The Core i5-1334U packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 134U offers 12 cores / 14 threads — the Core Ultra 5 134U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-1334U versus 4.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 134U — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-1334U (base: 1.3 GHz vs 0.7 GHz). The Core i5-1334U uses the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 134U uses Meteor Lake-U (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1334U scores 13,265 against the Core Ultra 5 134U's 13,169 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-1334U. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-1334U | Core Ultra 5 134U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12 | 12 / 14+20% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+5% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz+86% | 0.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-U (2023) | Meteor Lake-U (2023) |
| PassMark | 13,265 | 13,169 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,390 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1334U uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 134U uses FCBGA2551 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-1334U | Core Ultra 5 134U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA2551 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-5200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-1334U) / not specified (Core Ultra 5 134U). The Core i5-1334U includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 80EU), while the Core Ultra 5 134U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1334U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-1334U rivals Ryzen 5 7520U.
| Feature | Core i5-1334U | Core Ultra 5 134U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Mainstream Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












