Core i5-1335UE vs Xeon E5-2470 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-1335UE vs Xeon E5-2470 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-1335UE vs Xeon E5-2470 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-1335UE

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1356 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2470 v2, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $312 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2470 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2470 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-1335UE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (10,701 vs 10,902).
❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1356, while Core i5-1335UE moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-1335UE better than Xeon E5-2470 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2470 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-1335UE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-1335UE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-1335UE is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-1335UE is the better buy right now. Core i5-1335UE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $312 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (34.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-1335UE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2013), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA1356, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 12 threads instead of 10/20. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-1335UE vs Xeon E5-2470 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1335UE

The Core i5-1335UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 10,902 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2470 v2

The Xeon E5-2470 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 10,701 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-1335UE packs 10 cores / 12 threads, matching the Xeon E5-2470 v2's 10 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-1335UE versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2470 v2 — a 33.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-1335UE (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-1335UE uses the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-2470 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1335UE scores 10,902 against the Xeon E5-2470 v2's 10,701 — a 1.9% lead for the Core i5-1335UE. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-1335UE vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2470 v2.

Feature	Core i5-1335UE	Xeon E5-2470 v2
Cores / Threads	10 / 12	10 / 20
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+41%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	2.4 GHz+85%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	25 MB (total)+108%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-U (2023)	Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)
PassMark	10,902+2%	10,701

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1335UE uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2470 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.