Core i5-1335UE vs Xeon E5-4650 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-1335UE vs Xeon E5-4650 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-1335UE vs Xeon E5-4650 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-1335UE

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,411 less on MSRP ($312 MSRP vs $1,723 MSRP).
✅Delivers 450.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.9 vs 6.4 PassMark/$ ($312 MSRP vs $1,723 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (10,902 vs 10,946).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4650 v2, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.

Xeon E5-4650 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-1335UE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 34.9 PassMark/$ ($1,723 MSRP vs $312 MSRP).
❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Core i5-1335UE moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-1335UE better than Xeon E5-4650 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4650 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-1335UE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4650 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-1335UE is the better buy right now. Core i5-1335UE comes in $1,411 cheaper on MSRP at $312 MSRP versus $1,723 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-4650 v2 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. It is also 450.0% better value on MSRP (34.9 vs 6.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-1335UE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2014) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-1335UE vs Xeon E5-4650 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1335UE

The Core i5-1335UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 10,902 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-4650 v2

The Xeon E5-4650 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 10,946 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-1335UE packs 10 cores / 12 threads, matching the Xeon E5-4650 v2's 10 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-1335UE versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-4650 v2 — a 43.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-1335UE (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-1335UE is built on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-1335UE scores 10,902 against the Xeon E5-4650 v2's 10,946 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-4650 v2. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-1335UE vs 25 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon E5-4650 v2.

Feature	Core i5-1335UE	Xeon E5-4650 v2
Cores / Threads	10 / 12	10 / 20
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+55%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	2.4 GHz+85%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	25 MB Intel® Smart Cache+108%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	—
Process	10 nm-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-U (2023)	—
PassMark	10,902	10,946

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1335UE uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-4650 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-1335UE	Xeon E5-4650 v2
Socket	FCBGA1744	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-1335UE was priced at $312, while the Xeon E5-4650 v2 came in at $1723. On launch pricing ($312 vs $1723), Core i5-1335UE was $1411 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-1335UE delivers 34.9 pts/$ vs 6.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4650 v2 — making the Core i5-1335UE the 138.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-1335UE	Xeon E5-4650 v2
MSRP	$312-82%	$1723
Performance per Dollar	34.9+445%	6.4
Release Date	2023	2014

Search Core i5-1335UE on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-4650 v2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.