Core i5-13400 vs Core i7-13620H

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400 vs Core i7-13620H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400 vs Core i7-13620H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400

2023

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13620H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (23,769 vs 23,804).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $221 MSRP, while Core i7-13620H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Core i7-13620H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics (64EU), while Core i5-13400 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13620H better than Core i5-13400?

Yes. Core i7-13620H is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 23.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13620H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 23.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13620H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13620H is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-13620H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $221 MSRP, and it still gives you a 23.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (107.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13620H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 10/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-13400 vs Core i7-13620H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400

The Core i5-13400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,769 points. Launch price was $221.

Core i7-13620H

The Core i7-13620H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 23,804 points. Launch price was $502.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-13400 and Core i7-13620H share an identical 10-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400 versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-13620H — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-13620H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-13400 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-13620H uses Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400 scores 23,769 against the Core i7-13620H's 23,804 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i7-13620H. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400 vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13620H.

Feature	Core i5-13400	Core i7-13620H
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	10 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.9 GHz+7%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+4%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	24 MB (total)+20%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
PassMark	23,769	23,804
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	15,176
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,859
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,766

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-13620H uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-13400	Core i7-13620H
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA1744
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	—	96 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-13400) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13620H). The Core i7-13620H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (64EU)), while the Core i5-13400 requires a dedicated GPU.