
Core i5-13400F

Core i5-13600T
Core i5-13400F vs Core i5-13600T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13400F vs Core i5-13600T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13400F vs Core i5-13600T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $59 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $255 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 110.6 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $255 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 18,100).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-13600T
2023Why buy it
- ✅+11.7% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,364 vs 2,407).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 110.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($255 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600T better than Core i5-13400F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F vs Core i5-13600T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i5-13600T
The Core i5-13600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,202 points. Launch price was $255.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i5-13600T offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Core i5-13600T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-13600T — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). Both are built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture using a Intel 7 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i5-13600T's 28,202 — a 11.9% lead for the Core i5-13600T. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 18,100 (11% advantage for the Core i5-13600T). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 2,364, a 1.8% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 10,911 (4.5% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-13600T.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13600T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 14 / 20+40% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.8 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+39% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+20% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 25,029 | 28,202+13% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | 18,100+12% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407+2% | 2,364 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408+5% | 10,911 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and H610,B660,Z690,B760,Z790 (Core i5-13600T).
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13600T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13600T). The Core i5-13600T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Core i5-13600T targets Quiet Desktop / SFF PC. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Core i5-13600T rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13600T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Gaming | Quiet Desktop / SFF PC |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Core i5-13600T came in at $255. On launch pricing ($196 vs $255), Core i5-13400F was $59 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 110.6 pts/$ for the Core i5-13600T — making the Core i5-13400F the 14.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i5-13600T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196-23% | $255 |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7+15% | 110.6 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















