
Core i5-13400F

Core i7-11700K
Core i5-13400F vs Core i7-11700K Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13400F vs Core i7-11700K FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13400F vs Core i7-11700K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅+10% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $203 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 109.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 61.1 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-11700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 750, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,732 vs 16,211).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.1 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Core i7-11700K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F vs Core i7-11700K Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Core i7-11700K
The Core i7-11700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 24,362 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-11700K offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5 GHz on the Core i7-11700K — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-11700K (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-11700K uses Rocket Lake (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Core i7-11700K's 24,362 — a 2.7% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 14,732 (9.6% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-11700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+44% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+25% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+40860% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Rocket Lake (2021) |
| PassMark | 25,029+3% | 24,362 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211+10% | 14,732 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-11700K uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-11700K — the Core i5-13400F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and Z590,B560 (Core i7-11700K).
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-11700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+50% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-11700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i7-11700K supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-11700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 750), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-11700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 750 |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Core i7-11700K came in at $399. On launch pricing ($196 vs $399), Core i5-13400F was $203 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 61.1 pts/$ for the Core i7-11700K — making the Core i5-13400F the 70.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Core i7-11700K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $196-51% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7+109% | 61.1 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















