Core i5-13400F vs EPYC 7313

CPU

GPU

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

•••••••••

EPYC 7313

16 Cores32 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2021

Popular choices:

••••i5-13400F•••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i5-13400F

10 / 16

25,029

0.0%

38,938

+55.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅+38.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $887 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
✅Delivers 255.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 36.0 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 26,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7313, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 7313

2021

Why buy it

✅+63.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+540% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,736 vs 2,407).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 36.0 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

EPYC 7313

2021

Why buy it

✅+38.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $887 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
✅Delivers 255.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 36.0 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+63.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+540% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,211 vs 26,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7313, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,736 vs 2,407).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 36.0 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than EPYC 7313?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 7313 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7313 is the better fit. You are getting 63.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 540% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $887 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $1,083 MSRP, and it gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 7313 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 63.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. It is also 255.2% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 36.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of SP3. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

EPYC 7313 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 7313
1080p
low	171 FPS	166 FPS
medium	158 FPS	136 FPS
high	132 FPS	116 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	91 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	147 FPS
medium	123 FPS	118 FPS
high	99 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	69 FPS
medium	74 FPS	59 FPS
high	59 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	38 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open EPYC 7313

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 7313
1080p
low	545 FPS	505 FPS
medium	464 FPS	441 FPS
high	389 FPS	354 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	287 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	415 FPS
medium	403 FPS	372 FPS
high	345 FPS	307 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	242 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	255 FPS
medium	247 FPS	233 FPS
high	231 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	170 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open EPYC 7313

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 7313
1080p
low	530 FPS	665 FPS
medium	449 FPS	555 FPS
high	415 FPS	518 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	451 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	504 FPS
medium	422 FPS	419 FPS
high	382 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	333 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	372 FPS
medium	331 FPS	290 FPS
high	296 FPS	260 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	209 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open EPYC 7313

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 7313
1080p
low	626 FPS	903 FPS
medium	626 FPS	822 FPS
high	626 FPS	708 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	624 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	721 FPS
medium	626 FPS	628 FPS
high	598 FPS	538 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	460 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	517 FPS
medium	492 FPS	462 FPS
high	439 FPS	406 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	349 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open EPYC 7313

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and EPYC 7313

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

EPYC 7313

The EPYC 7313 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,938 points. Launch price was $1,083.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 7313 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7313 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7313 — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7313 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the EPYC 7313's 38,938 — a 43.5% lead for the EPYC 7313. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 26,500 (48.2% advantage for the EPYC 7313). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,736, a 32.4% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 15,264 (28.9% advantage for the EPYC 7313). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7313.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 7313
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	16 / 32+60%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+24%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	128 MB (total)+540%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm+
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark	25,029	38,938+56%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	26,500+63%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407+39%	1,736
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	15,264+34%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7313 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7313 — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7313 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 8 (EPYC 7313). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 128 (EPYC 7313) — the EPYC 7313 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and SP3,Milan (EPYC 7313).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 7313
Socket	LGA1700	SP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU (EPYC 7313). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, EPYC 7313 targets Server / High-load computing. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; EPYC 7313 rivals Xeon Gold 6326.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	EPYC 7313
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU
Target Use	Gaming	Server / High-load computing

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the EPYC 7313 debuted at $1083. On MSRP ($196 vs $1083), the Core i5-13400F is $887 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 36.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 7313 — making the Core i5-13400F the 112.1% better value option.