
Core i5-13400F

M4 Pro (14 cores)
Core i5-13400F vs M4 Pro (14 cores) Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13400F vs M4 Pro (14 cores) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13400F vs M4 Pro (14 cores): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike M4 Pro (14 cores).
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (25,029 vs 38,127).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while M4 Pro (14 cores) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while M4 Pro (14 cores) can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
M4 Pro (14 cores)
2024Why buy it
- β +52.3% higher PassMark.
- β Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M4 Pro GPU (20-core), while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is M4 Pro (14 cores) better than Core i5-13400F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F vs M4 Pro (14 cores) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
M4 Pro (14 cores)
The M4 Pro (14 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.59 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 38,127 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the M4 Pro (14 cores) offers 14 cores / 14 threads β the M4 Pro (14 cores) has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.5 GHz on the M4 Pro (14 cores) β a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.59 GHz). The Core i5-13400F is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the M4 Pro (14 cores)'s 38,127 β a 41.5% lead for the M4 Pro (14 cores).
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | M4 Pro (14 cores) |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 14 / 14+40% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+2% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.59 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | β |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | β |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) | β |
| PassMark | 25,029 | 38,127+52% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M4 Pro (14 cores) uses none (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus 8533 on the M4 Pro (14 cores) β the M4 Pro (14 cores) supports 77.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB β 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 0 (M4 Pro (14 cores)). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 0 (M4 Pro (14 cores)) β the Core i5-13400F offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and Apple M4 (M4 Pro (14 cores)).
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | M4 Pro (14 cores) |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | 8533+78% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+200% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 0 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M4 Pro (14 cores)). The M4 Pro (14 cores) includes integrated graphics (Apple M4 Pro GPU (20-core)), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; M4 Pro (14 cores) rivals Core Ultra 7 258V.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | M4 Pro (14 cores) |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | Apple M4 Pro GPU (20-core) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d (macOS) |
| Target Use | Gaming | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














