
Core i5-13400F

Pentium M 745
Core i5-13400F vs Pentium M 745 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13400F vs Pentium M 745 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13400F vs Pentium M 745: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +1636.9% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of PGA478 and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium M 745.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Pentium M 745 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌209.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 21W.
Pentium M 745
2004Why buy it
- ✅Draws 21W instead of 65W, a 44W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (100 vs 11,408).
- ❌Older platform position on PGA478, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Pentium M 745?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F vs Pentium M 745 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Pentium M 745
The Pentium M 745 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 465 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Pentium M 745 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 9 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 1.8 GHz on the Pentium M 745 — a 87.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Pentium M 745 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Pentium M 745's 465 — a 192.7% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 100, a 184% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 100 (196.5% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 0 kB on the Pentium M 745.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Pentium M 745 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+900% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+156% | 1.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+39% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB+60% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-92% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| PassMark | 25,029+5283% | 465 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407+2307% | 100 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408+11308% | 100 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Pentium M 745 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR2 on the Pentium M 745 — the Core i5-13400F supports 239900% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 9500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 1 (Pentium M 745). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 0 (Pentium M 745) — the Core i5-13400F offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and Intel 855GME,Intel 855PM (Pentium M 745).
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Pentium M 745 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+355% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+239900% | DDR2 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+9500% | 2 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs false (Pentium M 745). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Pentium M 745 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | false |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














