Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen 3 5425U

Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 5425U

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2022

Popular choices:

i5-13400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +69.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
  • 25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 5425U.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 5425U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 5425U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 3 5425U

2022

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon RX Vega 6, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (5,761 vs 16,211).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
  • Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen 3 5425U?
Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 69.9% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 181.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 122.1% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 69.9% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 181.4% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 69.9% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FP6, 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 3 5425U
1080p
low171 FPS170 FPS
medium158 FPS144 FPS
high132 FPS114 FPS
ultra112 FPS91 FPS
1440p
low143 FPS145 FPS
medium123 FPS121 FPS
high99 FPS95 FPS
ultra84 FPS75 FPS
4K
low81 FPS68 FPS
medium74 FPS60 FPS
high59 FPS47 FPS
ultra46 FPS37 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 3 5425U
1080p
low545 FPS271 FPS
medium464 FPS235 FPS
high389 FPS215 FPS
ultra356 FPS185 FPS
1440p
low458 FPS235 FPS
medium403 FPS207 FPS
high345 FPS192 FPS
ultra301 FPS164 FPS
4K
low280 FPS183 FPS
medium247 FPS166 FPS
high231 FPS141 FPS
ultra204 FPS118 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 3 5425U
1080p
low530 FPS282 FPS
medium449 FPS282 FPS
high415 FPS282 FPS
ultra375 FPS282 FPS
1440p
low490 FPS282 FPS
medium422 FPS282 FPS
high382 FPS282 FPS
ultra343 FPS282 FPS
4K
low393 FPS282 FPS
medium331 FPS278 FPS
high296 FPS242 FPS
ultra246 FPS190 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 3 5425U
1080p
low626 FPS282 FPS
medium626 FPS282 FPS
high626 FPS282 FPS
ultra626 FPS282 FPS
1440p
low626 FPS282 FPS
medium626 FPS282 FPS
high598 FPS282 FPS
ultra521 FPS282 FPS
4K
low535 FPS282 FPS
medium492 FPS282 FPS
high439 FPS282 FPS
ultra382 FPS282 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 3 5425U

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

AMD

Ryzen 3 5425U

The Ryzen 3 5425U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,270 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 3 5425U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 3 5425U — a 11.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 3 5425U uses Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 3 5425U's 11,270 — a 75.8% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,211 vs 5,761 (95.1% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,407 vs 1,663, a 36.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,408 vs 4,701 (83.3% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 5425U.

FeatureCore i5-13400FRyzen 3 5425U
Cores / Threads
10 / 16+150%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz+12%
4.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
2.7 GHz+8%
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)+150%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
512K (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
7 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023)
PassMark
25,029+122%
11,270
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211+181%
5,761
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407+45%
1,663
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408+143%
4,701
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 3 5425U uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 3 5425U — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 16 (Ryzen 3 5425U) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and FP6 (Ryzen 3 5425U).

FeatureCore i5-13400FRyzen 3 5425U
Socket
LGA1700
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB+500%
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20+25%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 3 5425U). The Ryzen 3 5425U includes integrated graphics (Radeon RX Vega 6), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming, Ryzen 3 5425U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCore i5-13400FRyzen 3 5425U
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon RX Vega 6
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V
Target Use
Gaming
Budget