
Core i5-13400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅+13.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.3% higher average FPS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,132 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Core i5-13400F
2023Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+13.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.3% higher average FPS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,132 vs 25,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 388 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 254 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 194 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 553 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 537 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 445 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 378 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 312 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 553 FPS |
| ultra | 626 FPS | 553 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 553 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 547 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 387 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.


Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,132 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS uses Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS's 22,132 — a 12.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 4.3 GHz+72% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+25% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 6 MB+380% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 25,029+13% | 22,132 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












