Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

6 Cores12 Thrd6 WWMax: 5 GHz2023

Popular choices:

i5-13400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • +13.1% higher PassMark.
  • +25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +20.3% higher average FPS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (22,132 vs 25,029).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is ahead with a 20.3% average FPS lead across 9 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F pulls ahead with 13.1% better PassMark. Core i5-13400F also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the better fit. You are getting 13.1% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 13.1% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 20.3% average FPS lead across 9 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 5 PRO 7640HS
1080p
low171 FPS269 FPS
medium158 FPS242 FPS
high132 FPS203 FPS
ultra112 FPS175 FPS
1440p
low143 FPS236 FPS
medium123 FPS193 FPS
high99 FPS157 FPS
ultra84 FPS138 FPS
4K
low81 FPS164 FPS
medium74 FPS136 FPS
high59 FPS105 FPS
ultra46 FPS92 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 5 PRO 7640HS
1080p
low545 FPS447 FPS
medium464 FPS371 FPS
high389 FPS326 FPS
ultra356 FPS287 FPS
1440p
low458 FPS388 FPS
medium403 FPS336 FPS
high345 FPS297 FPS
ultra301 FPS254 FPS
4K
low280 FPS279 FPS
medium247 FPS247 FPS
high231 FPS231 FPS
ultra204 FPS194 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 5 PRO 7640HS
1080p
low530 FPS553 FPS
medium449 FPS553 FPS
high415 FPS553 FPS
ultra375 FPS537 FPS
1440p
low490 FPS553 FPS
medium422 FPS553 FPS
high382 FPS517 FPS
ultra343 FPS445 FPS
4K
low393 FPS502 FPS
medium331 FPS444 FPS
high296 FPS378 FPS
ultra246 FPS312 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-13400FRyzen 5 PRO 7640HS
1080p
low626 FPS553 FPS
medium626 FPS553 FPS
high626 FPS553 FPS
ultra626 FPS553 FPS
1440p
low626 FPS553 FPS
medium626 FPS553 FPS
high598 FPS553 FPS
ultra521 FPS547 FPS
4K
low535 FPS553 FPS
medium492 FPS507 FPS
high439 FPS452 FPS
ultra382 FPS387 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,132 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS uses Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS's 22,132 — a 12.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS.

FeatureCore i5-13400FRyzen 5 PRO 7640HS
Cores / Threads
10 / 16+67%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
5 GHz+9%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
4.3 GHz+72%
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)+25%
16 MB
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
6 MB+380%
Process
Intel 7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
PassMark
25,029+13%
22,132
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-13400FRyzen 5 PRO 7640HS
Socket
LGA1700
FP7/FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCore i5-13400FRyzen 5 PRO 7640HS
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming