Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

CPU

GPU

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

16 Cores32 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Threadripper Pro family

··

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX Performance Spectrum

Core i5-13400F

10 / 16

25,029

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

16 / 32

39,929

+59.5%

Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS

Ryzen 5 7500F

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $953 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
✅Delivers 267.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 34.8 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 39,929).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+220% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.8 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($1,149 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX better than Core i5-13400F?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 18.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is the stronger fit. You are getting 59.5% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 220% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX comes in 486.2% more expensive on MSRP at $1,149 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 267.5% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 34.8 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of sWRX8. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13400F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Castle Peak (2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 39,929 points. Launch price was $1,149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX uses Castle Peak (2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX's 39,929 — a 45.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	16 / 32+60%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+7%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.9 GHz+56%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	64 MB+220%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Castle Peak (2020)
PassMark	25,029	39,929+60%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus 3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX — the Core i5-13400F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 966.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Socket	LGA1700	sWRX8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+50%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	2048 GB+967%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX rivals Xeon Silver 4314.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX came in at $1149. On launch pricing ($196 vs $1149), Core i5-13400F was $953 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 34.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX — making the Core i5-13400F the 114.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
MSRP	$196-83%	$1149
Performance per Dollar	127.7+267%	34.8
Release Date	2023	2020

Search Core i5-13400F on Amazon

Search Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.