
Core i5-13400F

Xeon E5-2698B V3
Core i5-13400F vs Xeon E5-2698B V3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13400F vs Xeon E5-2698B V3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13400F vs Xeon E5-2698B V3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +10.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 65W instead of 135W, a 70W reduction.
- β Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011-3 and DDR4.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2698B V3.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 40 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2698B V3, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- βLaunch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2698B V3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2698B V3
2015Why buy it
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 20 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (16,287 vs 25,029).
- β107.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 65W.
- βOlder platform position on LGA2011-3 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Xeon E5-2698B V3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F vs Xeon E5-2698B V3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon E5-2698B V3
The Xeon E5-2698B V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014β2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 16,287 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2698B V3 offers 16 cores / 32 threads β the Xeon E5-2698B V3 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2698B V3 β a 30% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2698B V3 uses Haswell-EP (2014β2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon E5-2698B V3's 16,287 β a 42.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 40 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2698B V3.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon E5-2698B V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 16 / 32+60% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+35% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+25% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 40 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 256K (per core)+20380% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023β2024) | Haswell-EP (2014β2015) |
| PassMark | 25,029+54% | 16,287 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,211 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,407 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,408 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2698B V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon E5-2698B V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2011-3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F) / not specified (Xeon E5-2698B V3). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-13400F | Xeon E5-2698B V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | β |
| Target Use | Gaming | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














