PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $6,423 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $6,619 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1645.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $6,619 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E7-4880 v2.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 48,435).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 38 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-4880 v2, which brings 15 cores / 30 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E7-4880 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅+93.5% higher PassMark.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (38 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 15 cores / 30 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($6,619 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Xeon E7-4880 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $6,423 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $6,619 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1645.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $6,619 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E7-4880 v2.

Why buy it

✅+93.5% higher PassMark.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (38 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 15 cores / 30 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 48,435).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 38 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-4880 v2, which brings 15 cores / 30 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($6,619 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Xeon E7-4880 v2?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E7-4880 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7-4880 v2 is the better fit. You are getting 93.5% better PassMark, backed by 15 cores and 30 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (38 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13400F is $6,423 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $6,619 MSRP, and it gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon E7-4880 v2 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 93.5% better PassMark. It is also 1645.1% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 7.3 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2014) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Xeon E7-4880 v2 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon E7-4880 v2
1080p
low	171 FPS	182 FPS
medium	158 FPS	145 FPS
high	132 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	150 FPS
medium	123 FPS	116 FPS
high	99 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	71 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	70 FPS
medium	74 FPS	58 FPS
high	59 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	37 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon E7-4880 v2

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon E7-4880 v2
1080p
low	545 FPS	368 FPS
medium	464 FPS	324 FPS
high	389 FPS	269 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	215 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	317 FPS
medium	403 FPS	282 FPS
high	345 FPS	237 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	183 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	198 FPS
medium	247 FPS	178 FPS
high	231 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	121 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon E7-4880 v2

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon E7-4880 v2
1080p
low	530 FPS	912 FPS
medium	449 FPS	797 FPS
high	415 FPS	755 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	671 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	732 FPS
medium	422 FPS	631 FPS
high	382 FPS	597 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	531 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	472 FPS
medium	331 FPS	372 FPS
high	296 FPS	332 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	271 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon E7-4880 v2

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon E7-4880 v2
1080p
low	626 FPS	1088 FPS
medium	626 FPS	960 FPS
high	626 FPS	813 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	677 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	876 FPS
medium	626 FPS	750 FPS
high	598 FPS	632 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	521 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	634 FPS
medium	492 FPS	552 FPS
high	439 FPS	476 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	397 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon E7-4880 v2

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon E7-4880 v2

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon E7-4880 v2

The Xeon E7-4880 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 48,435 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E7-4880 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the Xeon E7-4880 v2 has 5 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E7-4880 v2 — a 39% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-13400F is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon E7-4880 v2's 48,435 — a 63.7% lead for the Xeon E7-4880 v2. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-4880 v2.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon E7-4880 v2
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	15 / 30+50%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+48%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	37.5 MB+88%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	—
Process	Intel 7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	—
PassMark	25,029	48,435+94%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E7-4880 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus 1600 on the Xeon E7-4880 v2 — the Xeon E7-4880 v2 supports 198.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-4880 v2 supports up to 1536 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 4 (Xeon E7-4880 v2). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 40 (Xeon E7-4880 v2) — the Xeon E7-4880 v2 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and C602-J (Xeon E7-4880 v2).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon E7-4880 v2
Socket	LGA1700	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	1600+31900%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+13107100%	1536
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	40+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Xeon E7-4880 v2 rivals AMD Opteron 6380.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon E7-4880 v2
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Xeon E7-4880 v2 debuted at $6619. On MSRP ($196 vs $6619), the Core i5-13400F is $6423 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 7.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E7-4880 v2 — making the Core i5-13400F the 178.3% better value option.