PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13400F vs Xeon E7-8895 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13400F vs Xeon E7-8895 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $6,645 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $6,841 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1428.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $6,841 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA2011 and older memory support.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E7-8895 v2.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 57,165).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 38 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-8895 v2, which brings 15 cores / 30 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E7-8895 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅+128.4% higher PassMark.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (38 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 15 cores / 30 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($6,841 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on FCLGA2011, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Xeon E7-8895 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7-8895 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7-8895 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 128.4% better PassMark, backed by 15 cores and 30 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (38 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in $6,645 cheaper on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $6,841 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E7-8895 v2 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 128.4% better PassMark. It is also 1428.2% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 8.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2014) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FCLGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13400F vs Xeon E7-8895 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon E7-8895 v2

The Xeon E7-8895 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2014-02-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 57,165 points. Launch price was $6,841.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E7-8895 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the Xeon E7-8895 v2 has 5 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E7-8895 v2 — a 24.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-13400F is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon E7-8895 v2's 57,165 — a 78.2% lead for the Xeon E7-8895 v2. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-8895 v2.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon E7-8895 v2
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	15 / 30+50%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+28%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.8 GHz+12%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	37.5 MB+88%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	—
Process	Intel 7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	—
PassMark	25,029	57,165+128%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E7-8895 v2 uses FCLGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F versus 1600 on the Xeon E7-8895 v2 — the Core i5-13400F supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-8895 v2 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 4 (Xeon E7-8895 v2). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 40 (Xeon E7-8895 v2) — the Xeon E7-8895 v2 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and C602-J (Xeon E7-8895 v2).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon E7-8895 v2
Socket	LGA1700	FCLGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+200%	1600
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	1536 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	40+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Xeon E7-8895 v2 rivals AMD Opteron 6386 SE.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon E7-8895 v2
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-13400F was priced at $196, while the Xeon E7-8895 v2 came in at $6841. On launch pricing ($196 vs $6841), Core i5-13400F was $6645 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 8.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E7-8895 v2 — making the Core i5-13400F the 175.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon E7-8895 v2
MSRP	$196-97%	$6841
Performance per Dollar	127.7+1420%	8.4
Release Date	2023	2014

Search Core i5-13400F on Amazon

Search Xeon E7-8895 v2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.