PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $993 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
✅Delivers 319.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 30.4 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon w5-3425.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-3425 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 36,178).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-3425, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.

Xeon w5-3425

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅460% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.4 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($1,189 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Xeon w5-3425

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $993 less on MSRP ($196 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
✅Delivers 319.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 30.4 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon w5-3425.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅460% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-3425 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (25,029 vs 36,178).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-3425, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.4 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($1,189 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w5-3425 better than Core i5-13400F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon w5-3425 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w5-3425 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 32.1% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w5-3425 is the better fit. You are getting 44.5% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w5-3425 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon w5-3425 is 506.6% more expensive on MSRP at $1,189 MSRP versus $196 MSRP, and it gives you a 32.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13400F is also 319.7% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 30.4 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w5-3425 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB), more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 10/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13400F Benchmark Check

Xeon w5-3425 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon w5-3425
1080p
low	171 FPS	172 FPS
medium	158 FPS	155 FPS
high	132 FPS	127 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	107 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	143 FPS
medium	123 FPS	123 FPS
high	99 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	77 FPS
medium	74 FPS	71 FPS
high	59 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	44 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon w5-3425

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon w5-3425
1080p
low	545 FPS	579 FPS
medium	464 FPS	497 FPS
high	389 FPS	417 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	378 FPS
1440p
low	458 FPS	490 FPS
medium	403 FPS	433 FPS
high	345 FPS	373 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	322 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	303 FPS
medium	247 FPS	269 FPS
high	231 FPS	251 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	219 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon w5-3425

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon w5-3425
1080p
low	530 FPS	898 FPS
medium	449 FPS	812 FPS
high	415 FPS	775 FPS
ultra	375 FPS	691 FPS
1440p
low	490 FPS	781 FPS
medium	422 FPS	703 FPS
high	382 FPS	667 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	595 FPS
4K
low	393 FPS	523 FPS
medium	331 FPS	440 FPS
high	296 FPS	399 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	332 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon w5-3425

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13400F	Xeon w5-3425
1080p
low	626 FPS	904 FPS
medium	626 FPS	904 FPS
high	626 FPS	884 FPS
ultra	626 FPS	765 FPS
1440p
low	626 FPS	904 FPS
medium	626 FPS	847 FPS
high	598 FPS	727 FPS
ultra	521 FPS	619 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	683 FPS
medium	492 FPS	604 FPS
high	439 FPS	534 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i5-13400F Open Xeon w5-3425

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400F and Xeon w5-3425

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Xeon w5-3425

The Xeon w5-3425 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 36,178 points. Launch price was $1,189.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13400F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon w5-3425 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon w5-3425 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon w5-3425 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-13400F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon w5-3425 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400F scores 25,029 against the Xeon w5-3425's 36,178 — a 36.4% lead for the Xeon w5-3425. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F vs 30 MB on the Xeon w5-3425.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon w5-3425
Cores / Threads	10 / 16	12 / 24+20%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.2 GHz+28%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	30 MB+50%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	25,029	36,178+45%
Cinebench R23 Multi	16,211	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,407	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,408	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w5-3425 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon w5-3425 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13400F) vs 8 (Xeon w5-3425). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400F) vs 112 (Xeon w5-3425) — the Xeon w5-3425 offers 92 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F) and W790 (Xeon w5-3425).

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon w5-3425
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	112+460%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon w5-3425 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Core i5-13400F	Xeon w5-3425
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13400F launched at $196 MSRP, while the Xeon w5-3425 debuted at $1189. On MSRP ($196 vs $1189), the Core i5-13400F is $993 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400F delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 30.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-3425 — making the Core i5-13400F the 123% better value option.