Core i5-13420H vs Xeon E5-2689 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13420H vs Xeon E5-2689 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13420H vs Xeon E5-2689 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13420H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 165W, a 120W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011-3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2689 v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.

Xeon E5-2689 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13420H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (17,084 vs 17,205).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,723 MSRP, while Core i5-13420H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌266.7% higher power demand at 165W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011-3 with DDR4, while Core i5-13420H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13420H better than Xeon E5-2689 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2689 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13420H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13420H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13420H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13420H is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2689 v4 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i5-13420H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,723 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2689 v4 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13420H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011-3, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 12 threads instead of 10/20. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13420H vs Xeon E5-2689 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13420H

The Core i5-13420H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 17,205 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2689 v4

The Xeon E5-2689 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,084 points. Launch price was $2,723.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13420H packs 8 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2689 v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2689 v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13420H versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2689 v4 — a 19% clock advantage for the Core i5-13420H (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-13420H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2689 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13420H scores 17,205 against the Xeon E5-2689 v4's 17,084 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-13420H. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-13420H vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2689 v4.

Feature	Core i5-13420H	Xeon E5-2689 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 12	10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+21%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.1 GHz+48%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	25 MB+108%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2.5 MB+25%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	17,205	17,084

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13420H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2689 v4 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.