
Core i5-1345UE
Popular choices:

Core i7-8700T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-1345UE
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8700T across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌3% HIGHER MSRP$312 MSRPvs$303 MSRP
Core i7-8700T
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $9 less on MSRP ($303 MSRP vs $312 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,213 vs 10,343).
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core i5-1345UE moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Core i5-1345UE
2023Core i7-8700T
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $9 less on MSRP ($303 MSRP vs $312 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8700T across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌3% HIGHER MSRP$312 MSRPvs$303 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,213 vs 10,343).
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core i5-1345UE moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-1345UE better than Core i7-8700T?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-1345UE | Core i7-8700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-1345UE | Core i7-8700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 209 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 134 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-1345UE | Core i7-8700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 255 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 255 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-1345UE | Core i7-8700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 255 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 255 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 255 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1345UE and Core i7-8700T

Core i5-1345UE
Core i5-1345UE
The Core i5-1345UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 10,343 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-8700T
Core i7-8700T
The Core i7-8700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 10,213 points. Launch price was $303.
Processing Power
The Core i5-1345UE packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-8700T offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-1345UE has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-1345UE versus 4 GHz on the Core i7-8700T — a 14% clock advantage for the Core i5-1345UE (base: 1.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-1345UE uses the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-8700T uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1345UE scores 10,343 against the Core i7-8700T's 10,213 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i5-1345UE. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-1345UE | Core i7-8700T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+15% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz+71% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-U (2023) | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) |
| PassMark | 10,343+1% | 10,213 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1345UE uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-8700T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-1345UE | Core i7-8700T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-1345UE launched at $312 MSRP, while the Core i7-8700T debuted at $303. On MSRP ($312 vs $303), the Core i7-8700T is $9 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-1345UE delivers 33.2 pts/$ vs 33.7 pts/$ for the Core i7-8700T — making the Core i7-8700T the 1.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-1345UE | Core i7-8700T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $312 | $303-3% |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.2 | 33.7+2% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











