
Core i5-1345UE

Xeon E7540
Core i5-1345UE vs Xeon E7540 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-1345UE vs Xeon E7540 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-1345UE vs Xeon E7540: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-1345UE
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,668 less on MSRP ($312 MSRP vs $1,980 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 532.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 33.2 vs 5.2 PassMark/$ ($312 MSRP vs $1,980 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1567 and older memory support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,343 vs 10,376).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7540, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E7540
2010Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-1345UE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.2 vs 33.2 PassMark/$ ($1,980 MSRP vs $312 MSRP).
- ❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1567, while Core i5-1345UE moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-1345UE better than Xeon E7540?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-1345UE vs Xeon E7540 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1345UE
The Core i5-1345UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 10,343 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E7540
The Xeon E7540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.27 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB L3 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1567. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 10,376 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i5-1345UE packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E7540 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-1345UE has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-1345UE versus 2.27 GHz on the Xeon E7540 — a 67.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-1345UE (base: 1.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-1345UE is built on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-1345UE scores 10,343 against the Xeon E7540's 10,376 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E7540. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-1345UE vs 18 MB L3 Cache on the Xeon E7540.
| Feature | Core i5-1345UE | Xeon E7540 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+103% | 2.27 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.4 GHz | 2 GHz+43% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 18 MB L3 Cache+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 10 nm-78% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-U (2023) | — |
| PassMark | 10,343 | 10,376 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1345UE uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E7540 uses LGA1567 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-1345UE | Xeon E7540 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA1567 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+150% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 2 TB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 32 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-1345UE) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E7540). Primary use case: Xeon E7540 targets Server.
| Feature | Core i5-1345UE | Xeon E7540 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-1345UE was priced at $312, while the Xeon E7540 came in at $1980. On launch pricing ($312 vs $1980), Core i5-1345UE was $1668 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-1345UE delivers 33.2 pts/$ vs 5.2 pts/$ for the Xeon E7540 — making the Core i5-1345UE the 145.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-1345UE | Xeon E7540 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $312-84% | $1980 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.2+538% | 5.2 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













