Core i5-13500 vs Ryzen 7 8700F

CPU

GPU

Core i5-13500

14 Cores20 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 8700F

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 5 GHz2024

Ryzen family

······

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-13500 vs Ryzen 7 8700F Performance Spectrum

Core i5-13500

14 / 20

31,109

0.0%

31,240

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13500 vs Ryzen 7 8700F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13500 vs Ryzen 7 8700F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13500

2023

Why buy it

✅+16% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Costs $28 less on MSRP ($242 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
✅Delivers 11.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 128.5 vs 115.7 PassMark/$ ($242 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 7 8700F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8700F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Ryzen 7 8700F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,040 vs 20,924).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 115.7 vs 128.5 PassMark/$ ($270 MSRP vs $242 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 8700F better than Core i5-13500?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 7 8700F is ahead with a 24.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13500 pulls ahead with 16% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i5-13500 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 16% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 8700F is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13500 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 7 8700F comes in 11.6% more expensive on MSRP at $270 MSRP versus $242 MSRP, and it still gives you a 24.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-13500 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 16% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i5-13500 is also 11.1% better value on MSRP (128.5 vs 115.7 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Core i5-13500 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 8700F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13500 vs Ryzen 7 8700F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13500

The Core i5-13500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,109 points. Launch price was $242.

Ryzen 7 8700F

The Ryzen 7 8700F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,240 points. Launch price was $270.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13500 packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8700F offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13500 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-13500 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8700F — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Core i5-13500 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8700F uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13500 scores 31,109 against the Ryzen 7 8700F's 31,240 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 8700F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 20,924 vs 18,040 (14.8% advantage for the Core i5-13500). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,419 vs 2,649, a 9.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 8700F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,160 vs 13,500 (10.4% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-13500 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8700F.

Feature	Core i5-13500	Ryzen 7 8700F
Cores / Threads	14 / 20+75%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz	5 GHz+4%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	4.1 GHz+64%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)+50%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Phoenix (2023−2024)
PassMark	31,109	31,240
Cinebench R23 Multi	20,924+16%	18,040
Geekbench 6 Single	2,419	2,649+10%
Geekbench 6 Multi	12,160	13,500+11%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13500 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 8700F uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-13500 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 8700F — the Ryzen 7 8700F supports 8.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 8700F supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760,Z690,B660 (Core i5-13500) and XB650,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 8700F).

Feature	Core i5-13500	Ryzen 7 8700F
Socket	LGA1700	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-5200+8%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	256 GB+33%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 8700F has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 8700F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13500) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 8700F). The Core i5-13500 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 7 8700F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13500 targets High-end Productivity / Gaming, Ryzen 7 8700F targets High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-13500 rivals Ryzen 7 7700; Ryzen 7 8700F rivals Core i7-14700F.

Feature	Core i5-13500	Ryzen 7 8700F
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	AMD-V
Target Use	High-end Productivity / Gaming	High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-13500 was priced at $242, while the Ryzen 7 8700F came in at $270. On launch pricing ($242 vs $270), Core i5-13500 was $28 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13500 delivers 128.5 pts/$ vs 115.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 8700F — making the Core i5-13500 the 10.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-13500	Ryzen 7 8700F
MSRP	$242-10%	$270
Performance per Dollar	128.5+11%	115.7
Release Date	2023	2024

Search Core i5-13500 on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 8700F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.