
Core i5-13500HX
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13500HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,565 vs 27,827).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $229 MSRP, while Core i5-13500HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core i5-13500HX
2023Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,565 vs 27,827).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $229 MSRP, while Core i5-13500HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 better than Core i5-13500HX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13500HX | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 85 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13500HX | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 441 FPS |
| high | 393 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 332 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 458 FPS | 451 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 350 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 288 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 203 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13500HX | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 689 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 689 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 689 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 689 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 689 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 689 FPS |
| high | 425 FPS | 689 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 621 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 372 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 333 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 285 FPS | 341 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13500HX | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 696 FPS | 689 FPS |
| medium | 696 FPS | 689 FPS |
| high | 696 FPS | 689 FPS |
| ultra | 646 FPS | 689 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 696 FPS | 689 FPS |
| medium | 696 FPS | 689 FPS |
| high | 610 FPS | 689 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 645 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 675 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 594 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 526 FPS |
| ultra | 391 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13500HX and Ryzen 5 PRO 7645

Core i5-13500HX
Core i5-13500HX
The Core i5-13500HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,827 points. Launch price was $326.


Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,565 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13500HX packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13500HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i5-13500HX versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-13500HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13500HX scores 27,827 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645's 27,565 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-13500HX. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-13500HX vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645.
| Feature | Core i5-13500HX | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz | 5.1 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz+52% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 27,827 | 27,565 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13500HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13500HX | Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












