
Core i5-13500HX

Xeon W-2195
Core i5-13500HX vs Xeon W-2195 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13500HX vs Xeon W-2195 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13500HX vs Xeon W-2195: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13500HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1964 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2195 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,827 vs 27,977).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2195, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon W-2195
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core i5-13500HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i5-13500HX moves to FCBGA1964 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-2195 better than Core i5-13500HX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13500HX vs Xeon W-2195 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13500HX
The Core i5-13500HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,827 points. Launch price was $326.

Xeon W-2195
The Xeon W-2195 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 27,977 points. Launch price was $2,553.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13500HX packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon W-2195 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon W-2195 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i5-13500HX versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2195 — a 8.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-13500HX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-13500HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-2195 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13500HX scores 27,827 against the Xeon W-2195's 27,977 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon W-2195. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-13500HX vs 24.75 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2195.
| Feature | Core i5-13500HX | Xeon W-2195 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 18 / 36+29% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+9% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+9% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 24.75 MB (total)+3% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 27,827 | 27,977 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,002 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13500HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-2195 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13500HX | Xeon W-2195 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 512 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-13500HX) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-2195). Primary use case: Xeon W-2195 targets Scientific Workstation / Data Analysis. Direct competitor: Xeon W-2195 rivals Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
| Feature | Core i5-13500HX | Xeon W-2195 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Scientific Workstation / Data Analysis |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














