
Core i5-13600HX
Popular choices:

Core i9-13900H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900H across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Core i9-13900H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,444 vs 27,646).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $617 MSRP, while Core i5-13600HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core i5-13600HX
2023Core i9-13900H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900H across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,444 vs 27,646).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $617 MSRP, while Core i5-13600HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900H better than Core i5-13600HX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600HX | Core i9-13900H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600HX | Core i9-13900H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 556 FPS | 636 FPS |
| medium | 472 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 400 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 457 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 492 FPS |
| high | 350 FPS | 416 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 357 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 296 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 246 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600HX | Core i9-13900H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 648 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 467 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 591 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 491 FPS |
| high | 425 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 370 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 374 FPS |
| high | 334 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 285 FPS | 290 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600HX | Core i9-13900H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 691 FPS | 686 FPS |
| medium | 691 FPS | 686 FPS |
| high | 691 FPS | 686 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 672 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 691 FPS | 686 FPS |
| medium | 691 FPS | 686 FPS |
| high | 610 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 531 FPS | 552 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600HX and Core i9-13900H

Core i5-13600HX
Core i5-13600HX
The Core i5-13600HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,646 points. Launch price was $284.

Core i9-13900H
Core i9-13900H
The Core i9-13900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,444 points. Launch price was $617.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-13600HX and Core i9-13900H share an identical 14-core/20-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-13600HX versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900H — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-13600HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-13900H uses Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600HX scores 27,646 against the Core i9-13900H's 27,444 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-13600HX. Both processors carry 24 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i5-13600HX | Core i9-13900H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 14 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.4 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 27,646 | 27,444 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-13900H uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13600HX | Core i9-13900H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | FCBGA1744 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













